site meter

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Is There a Culture of Death?

In this opinion piece in the Arabic daily Al Hayat, the writer condemns what he calls the "culture of death" that is being promoted by certain media and groups. He blames it all on Iran and its allies. He singles out Hizbollah's TV station Al Manar, which interviewed a little girl who expressed how "happy" she is that her father was martyred. He also mentions the example of the Palestinian mother of the latest suicide bomber who said she prayed for her son's success (actually I read two contradictory accounts: in one she reportedly said that she knew where he was going and prayed for him, and in the other that she didn't know where he disappeared to). He points out the hypocrisy or contradiction that these same groups and media praise the anti war demonstrations in the west and foreground the western mothers who are opposed to their sons going to war. Why praise those people's love for life but deny such a thing to your own people?

I'm aware of how the "culture of death" argument has been deployed by some people to dehumanize those they don't agree with and to obscure the politics at work. It's been an essential component of the "US versus Them" grid (These people do what they do because of a culture of death that denies life, thus they are different from us, who love and affirm life). The writer doesn't bother to acknowledge this use of "the culture of death" trope. This language, unfortuantely, seems to be seeping into Arab public discourse via the "I Love Life" USAID funded campaign launched by pro-government forces in Lebanon (and countered by the opposition with the "I Love Life Undictated" campaign.


"I Love Life"



"I Love Life Undictated" by Lebanese opposition

Moreover, one can dismiss the writer's singling out of Iran as a source for this culture as part of the anti-Iranian talk circulating in some quarters in the Arab world. Iran doesn't have a monopoly on the martyrdom racket afterall.

But still, like him, I have a problem with shoving a microphone in the face of a child so she can tell others how happy she was that her father is martyred. I understand why it's important for her to feel that way: it's her way of dealing with her grief. The loss has to be given a meaning. She is not different from an American child who believes his daddy who got killed in Iraq is in heaven. It's not different from that child saying he's "proud" of his daddy. I will hate it for Fox to shove a microphone in the face of that child so he can "perform" his pride to us the way that girl "performs" hers. Both are using these children for propaganda. But would we describe the American child who is proud of his daddy as someone who is taught a "death culture"? Generally, we don't. But maybe we should. (Have you been to the Gap Kids lately? I went in the other day to grab some pants for my son and was struck with how many items of clothing are military gear. Pants, shirts, sweat shirts, PJ's, socks, underwear. I came out cursing and empty handed).

Similarly, the Palestinian mother who said she's proud of her son is not different from the American mother who says that she's proud of her son who died fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan. For the Palestinian mother, her son is a soldier. But no matter what, a mother who just lost her son can say anything she wants as far as I'm concerned. The only meaning I get out of it, weather she's Palestinian, American, or Israeli, is that she is dealing with her grief in the face of the greatest loss of her life. She's not representing anything but this grief. She's not representing a "culture of death" or "Palestinian Nationalism" or any such lowly or grand idea.

But I get angered by those who use these mothers, who rush to them with the question: "what do you think of what he did? How do you feel?" As if she can say anything other than that she is proud of him. After all, that's the reason they go to her to begin with. They already know what she's going to say. Or hoping she would say it. Would they be rushing to her side is she were going to say, for instance, "God damn you all for taking my son away from me. Hope that Ghouleh Palestine will rot in hell for eating my child?" Would they report these words if she says them? Is it allowed for her to say them? (yet, some mothers do say them).

The pressure on the Palestinian mother to publicly stick to the nationalist script is more than it's on the American or Israeli mother. Not because of a "culture of death," but because in addition to the nationalist expectations, she's aware of those who demonize him. So she got to defend him, no matter what. Anything less is betrayal.

Is there a "culture of death"?

Sure there is. It's a culture of militarization and war. You don't believe me, go to the Gap and see for yourselves.

She Still Got It!


Give them hell, Nawal (Part 1, Part 2 in Arabic)

Clashes in Gaza: Whose Fault?


In her article about the armed clashes in Gaza between militias of Fateh and Hamas, Amira Hass draws attention back to the occupation which provides the context for such clashes. But she also sees Palestinian agency in the matter and rightly faults "the cult of armed men and weapons, which has spread in Palestinian society and has silenced any attempt to discuss the huge damage the use of weapons has caused the struggle against the Israeli occupation."

I agree. That's why I believe an interrogation of militaristic rhetoric and ideology is a necessary part of any serious self-critique we Palestinians are going to engage in. Blaming Dahlan alone doesn't take us far.

Dance: Thousand-Hand Guanyin

All 21 dancers in this video are deaf. They rely on hand signals from coaches at the four corners of the stage. I think it's amazing and certainly worth showing in disability studies classes.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

British Muslims: A Case Against Multiculturalism?


A fresh survey of Muslims in Britain has just come out of some British think tank oven. It found that 40% of young British Muslims want to be ruled by Shari'a laws in Britain (this means that 60% don't want Shari'a laws, no?) The majority, three fifths, also said that they have as much in common with non-Muslims as with Muslims (oh, they're just saying that. They can't possibly mean it. They ARE different).The survey finds that young British Muslims are more conservative than the older generation. And as usual these days it is used to argue that multiculturalism has failed.

Fine. To hell with multiculturalism. Pass the fish and chips.

Oh, Arab Street, Thou Art So Fickle!!


I'm sad to report that the romance between the Arab Street and Hizbollah may not make it to Valentine's Day!

As with all romances and heart breaks, there are two sides to the story: On the one hand, Arab street believes Hizbollah betrayed her love and injured her feelings when it gloated over the execution of an ex. True, it was a dysfunctional love-hate relationship with that ex, but still a relationship! Also Hizbollah is taking the Arab Street for granted and has been seen lately flirting with Politics As Usual.

Hizbollah, on the other hand, is not having any of it. He is accusing Arab Street of being fickle and ungrateful, forgetting too soon that she was handed a glorious victory on a divine plate--something none of her other suitors had ever done. Even that ex. she's waxing lyrical about, the best he could deliver was 39 scuds, half of which landed in the West Bank anyway.

I have it from sources close to both that Julia Butrus is trying to mediate between the two. Will she succeed? Stay tuned. But these things drag on, so while waiting, you may want to read this.

Monday, January 29, 2007

No To Fighting

Voices from Palestine

The BBC interviews four people in Palestine about the latest clashes between militias.

One of those interviewed, the Belgian NGO worker, mentions that people dismiss Mustafa Barghouti (who is head of the so called Palestinian Initiative and who received 20% of the presidential vote running against Abbas) as a "showman." That made me chuckle! As opposed to whom, I wondered? Do we have any leaders who are not "showmen" these days? They are born to perform in front of Al Jazeera and Al Arabeya. They belong in a circus not in a country.

Ok. Back to Fanon. I've been reading The Wretched of the Earth all day and it's making me quite wretched! I keep wondering what would he say if he were still alive today? He's fortunate to have died when he did--at the height of decolonization, not in these rotten times.

Islamic Jihad Scores!!!

Using a suicide bomber, Islamic Jihad scored today a significant goal against both Hamas and Fateh. While Hamas and Fateh's fighting killed six Palestinians today, Islamic Jihad's operation killed three Israelis and one Palestinian. It was only a matter of time before the smaller group capitalized on the fighting between its two main rivals. A new comer, a splinter group of Al Aqsa Brigades called "The Army of Believers," was allowed to participate in this particular attack, which is used to chastise both Fateh and Hamas and to win in the process some new supporters at a time the Palestinians are disgusted with both major groups.

In a pathetic gesture of mimicry of the way Israel, the US (and later Hizballah and the Iraq government) name their military operations, this suicide attack is given a name: "3amaleyyatThawaban al Jaleed al esteshhadeyeh" (the Ice Melting Martyrdom operation). Too grand a name in my opinion. A more realistic one would have been the "Croissant or bagel martyrdom operation" since the explosion happened in a bakery.

Many are tripping over themselves with the knee jerk reaction defending the suicide attack as "a natural response" (there's nothing "natural" about this) and asserting Palestinians' right to "resistance" (who the hell are they speaking to? Oh, each other, of course!) I was disappointed to see that among those who did that is Mustafa al Barghouti, who used to be more critical of suicide attacks. But I guess since he turned into a professional politician with an eye on the Chair he has to talk the talk and walk the walk. Too bad.

Resuming suicide attacks on Israeli civilians will not solve our problems. For after all one of these problems has been our redefining of "Resistance" to mean suicide bombings (a very nice present we handed to Israel) and the use of suicide bombings as a legitimizing tactic by any group or bastard that claims one regardless of the disasters they are bringing on our heads.

To me suicide bombings are reminders of how weak real, effective, grass root Palestinian resistance is: they simultaneously obscure that resistance and weaken it. Suicide bombings are a reminder of how weak the Palestinians are and how weak they will continue to be if they don't resist this "resistance."

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Ismail Haniyeh's New Look



I was happy to see that the latest spate of kidnappings and killings in Gaza didn't distract attention from some other important news, such as Ismail Haniyeh's "new look." (in Arabic)

Haniyeh has sported a Koufeyeh lately. He first showed up in a red one but then, perhaps after learning that it is associated with the leftists in Palestine, he decided to wear the black and white one. This wardrope decision earned him the accusation that he is imitating Arafat, but two of his spokesmen denied such baseless and malicious charges and threatened to sue anyone who would question the prime minister's radical chicness. They refused, however, to confirm or deny the news that a recent shipment of multiple colored koufeyehs has arrived in Gaza directly from Urban Outfitters.

"Welcome to the Palestinian Jungle"

Is the title of the Palestinian columnist Abdallah Awwad's opinion piece in Al Ayyam. He believes that the leadership of both fighting sides is actively complicit in the fighting and are not trying to calm things down. (in Arabic)

Saturday, January 27, 2007

To Veil or Not to Veil? How Many Times to Ask the Question?

The BBC speaks with four Muslim women about why they wear the veil. One, a munaqaba (full face cover), chose to wear it because it's an "act of worship" and because she doesn't trust men and wants to protect herself. Another, an Iraqi, is forced to wear a hijab at gun point. The other two are coerced into wearing it by peer pressure and social harassment.

Little Mosque in Suburbia

Imam Reda Shata may not be as cool as the Imam in "Little Mosque on the Prairie" but he remains The New York Times favorite Imam. The newspaper ran three long articles about him in March of 2006. I wrote about him then, wondering why do Muslims in America need a Muslim Imam from a small village in Egypt (Kufr al Bateekh) to guide them in their lives here.

Apparently, as a result of the publicity he gained some fame and some enemies ( his view that oral sex was allowed between married couples was too much for some groups). But he came up on top, leaving Brooklyn to the suburbs of New Jersey. Now, he shops at Costco and prays for its owners. His success provides the happy occasion for the NYT to write another long article about the Imam in suburbia.

What's next? Shata for president!!

A Portrait of Two Militias




Twenty three dead.

And still counting the mounting bodies in the weekend clashes between armed militias in Gaza. Since Abbas's threatened new elections 48 have died in such confrontations. No end seems to be in sight.

In this article, Leila El Haddad talks to some of those involved in the fighting on both sides. The piece is useful in showing the dangerous situation that exists and the disastrous consequences of the militarization of Palestinian society, the only "achievement" of Al Aqsa Intifada. If you are going to put guns in young men's hands, then don't be surprised at what they are going to do with them. Those who believe these guns are justified to fight the Israeli occupation have some explaining to do.

El Haddad piece, however, has its problems. She interviews both sides but not in the same way. The Hamas militias she talks to are part of the Executive Force, while the Fateh fighters are part of shadowy "death squads." A Hamas spokesman is "exuberant and mild mannered." One fighter has a "baby face" and another excuses himself during the interview to go pray. They are articulate and calm, caring only about protecting the Palestinian civilians (from? how?) Their guns are not tainted, that's why she doesn't ask them where they come from.

The Fateh fighters, in contrast, are on edge and "paranoid." Going to interview them is a journey into the underworld. One is so terrified of being shot (or is it just paranoia?) that he is incoherent. One of them speaks with sarcasm and has "steely eyes." He has an arsenal of weapons in his bedroom, probably tainted "American" weapons though he defensively denies that (why ask him about that except to taint him? Does she honestly think he has any say or clue?) He also has a drawer next to his bed that "is packed full of amphetamines, sleeping pills, hand grenades..." As if this is not bad enough, between sentences, he "puff[s] at his bedside sheesha." (Why grudge a dead man a smoke, Leila?) He refers to Dahlan as "Abu Fadi" (revealing his loyalty) and volunteers that Dhalan gave them Jeeps as little favors. Is there anything wrong with that? He asks, totally oblivious to how his words will sound to the majority of Al Jazeera readers who believe Dahlan is the devil incarnate.



The pictures she includes of both sides do the same thing: the one of the two Hamas militias show open-faced, almost shy young men with weapons. The Fateh militia strikes two poses: one with his face covered with a Kuffeyeh, carrying a weapon, wearing a grenade, and god knows what else. His other picture shows him sitting, surrounded with many weapons, looking into the camera with his "steely eyes".


I'm sure El Haddad can find baby faced Fateh fighters if she tries a bit harder. I'm sure she can find Hamas fighters who are sarcastic and who have steely eyes. She only needs look.

My point is that her portrayal, while attempting to give "both narratives," falls short because of these details she decides to include. Are they conscious or unconscious choices? I don't know. I only know that the article ends up participating in what it seems to be objecting to, the internal violence among Palestinians. It also proves its own thesis: that we are all to blame.

What I'm not comfortable with here is the demonization of individual Fateh fighters (or Hamas if the writer did that). They are members of militias. They are doing what members of militias usually do: follow orders and shoot at others. Their job is not to think or analyze. Their job is to kill. Both Hamas and Fateh kill. That's why they are carrying guns. Some of them are scared for their lives. All of them are targets. Everyone of them believes that he is doing the right thing. The worst of it: they all love that bitch Palestine. Their way.

There are political groups, parties, organizations, leaders who brought these militias to life, who finance them, who brainwash them. Our rage should be directed at those leaders--all of them (let me name a few: Abbas, Mash3al, Dahlan, Haniyeh, Rjoub, Zahhar). They should be held accountable for the monstrosities they've created and apologized for. They should be discredited, tried, and chucked on the garbage heap of history.

And those who cheered these militias, who continue to entertain the illusion that there is a good militia and a bad militia, whose heart skips a beat evertime they see a Palestinian young man carrying a gun, who believed they could use these young men to liberate Palestine--all of them/us need to do some serious thinking about how they contributed to this disaster.

Twenty three dead!

(all pictures from Leila El Haddad]

Friday, January 26, 2007

The Right to Drive a Car

From www.fullpassport.com


Hanadi Hindi , the first Saudi female pilot, can fly a plane but is not allowed to drive a car


Saudi Princess Lolwah Al-Faisal said that if she were a queen for one day she would allow women to drive but then added "or have a great trasportation system in the country."

Women's right to drive is exactly that--a right. A great transportation system is not an alternative.

Women's right to drive is their right to freedom of movement. It's their right to independence. It's their right to speeding tickets and road rages. t's their right to be stuck in traffic for hours. It's their right to be exploited by mechanics. It's their right to hate mechanics. It's their right to have their share of all the sexist jokes about how bad women drivers are.

Gaza Clashes



Thirteen people, including a two-year-old boy, died in Gaza yesterday as a result of clashes between Fateh and Hamas.

Here's a snap shot of what's going on as reported by Haaretz:

"Earlier, Hamas militants killed a wounded Fatah fighter in a gangland-style slaying, Fatah officials said, and on Thursday night attackers killed a Hamas activist in a bombing the group blamed on Fatah. Both attacks took place in Jabalya.

Local residents said women and civilians were trying to break the siege of the house of Mansour Shalayel of Fatah, throwing stones against the Hamas forces who responded with stun grenades.

The spokesman said that the militant was "executed" by members of Hamas' security force, who had come to question the slain militant about the death of one of their members.

He said a Hamas force firing rockets launched a predawn attack on the home of Nabil Jarjir, initially wounding him. As neighbors were taking the injured man to hospital the Hamas raiders stopped the car and killed him with a shot to the head, Fatah said."


But the good news is that Hamas celebrated lasting one year in power. Alf Mabrouk. A great achievement. Everything is under control.

"Little Mosque on the Prairie": Episode 1

A Classic


Mohamad abdel Wahab, "mesh ana elli abki" (I'm not the one to cry)

Thursday, January 25, 2007

When a Man's Honor Resides Between a Woman's Thighs

A Jordanian man fired four bullets into his 17 year-old-daughter's head to cleanse his "honor." The daughter soiled his honor by disappearing from the house for two weeks then coming back. Autopsy showed that she was a virgin.

The man will probably get six months in jail--a reduced sentence for murderers who label their crimes "honor killings." He will emerge from jail a proud man. None of his neighbors will stop talking to him. Other men will look up to him.

There have been people trying to pressure the parliament into changing the penal law so as to give the murderer a real sentence instead of a pat on the shoulder. But so far they have failed.

Don't you love it when suddenly Jordan becomes a democratic country that cannot change a law unless the parliament approves!

According to Al Arabiya report, there have been 12 such "honor killings" in Jordan last year (in Arabic). Honor killings occur in other Arab countries. Jordan is the only one that keeps official statistics.

These murders will continue as long as there are Arab men who believe that they own women and that their honor resides between these women's thighs. These murders will continue as long as there are women who agree with these men.

Gaza Talibanis

The same Palestinian Islamist group that bragged it threw acid on the face of an unveiled Palestinian woman, threatened to do it to other unveiled women, and tourched internet cafes and music stores a while back claimed responsibility for exploding a bomb in Al Arabiya channel offices in Gaza. The group, "Swords of Truth," said that the channel has been spreading lies about Islam and Muslims. (in Arabic)

Who's next?

Mahmoud Darwish: "The Mask Has Fallen"

Segregated Buses Are Still Running

Some Israeli women are petitioning the hight court against sex segregated buses in Jerusalem.

Israel Eichler, an ultra-Orthodox newspaper editor and former parliament member, protested against the appeal, calling it a bid "to impose Western secular culture on us, and all that mixing of men and women [in public] has caused."

I feel I heard that argument before. But where? where? where? I'm sure it will come to me!

By the way, where do transgendereds, transexuals, and the intersexed belong on these buses? What about gays? Do they have a special section in the middle of the bus? On top of the bus? Under the bus?

Just wondering!

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Fashion for Israeli Checkpoints









(stills from Chic point by Palestinian artist Sharif Waked)

Imagine Life

Checkpoints R US!


"One gets sick of reading about the checkpoints. One gets even sicker of writing about them. And the most sickening thing of all is to pass through them. But because the Palestinians have no alternative but to continue to pass through them, these checkpoints will continue to be the representatives of Israeli society," writes Amira Hass about this lofty Israeli institution.

Segregated Buses

Some Israeli women are petitioning the hight court against sex segregated buses in Jerusalem.

Israel Eichler, an ultra-Orthodox newspaper editor and former parliament member, protested against the appeal, calling it a bid "to impose Western secular culture on us, and all that mixing of men and women [in public] has caused."

I feel I heard that argument before. But where? where? where? I'm sure it will come to me!

By the way, where do transgendereds, transexuals, and the intersexed belong on these buses? What about gays? Do they have a special section in the middle of the bus? On top of the bus? Under the bus?

Just wondering!

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

How to Become a Virgin!


Let's not assume now that there is only rape and torture in Egypt these days. Other things are happening.

For example, some well to do women are paying doctors for hymen reconstructions so they can "surprise" their husbands on their wedding anniversay. In other words, they are becoming virgins again (and again and again. The sky is the limit folks!). They do it to spice up a dull sex life. Husbands are delighted and are quite pleasantly surprised. I bet. Actually, some couples go as far as "marrying again" and having another wedding to go with the new hymen. You bet. If a woman is going through the trouble of reconstructing her hymen, she deserves at least a new ring!

This will make a perfect rewedding song, don't you think?


powered by ODEO

And because common sense does not seem to cut it anymore, we have to turn to religious authorities to see what they say about this. The question is: Can I reconstruct my hymen and still be a good Muslim? The Muslim authority consulted thinks it is wrong to marry your wife again. That is not allowed. But constructing the hymen is another matter entirely. "I can't prevent a husband from asking his wife for a new hymen?" one wise dude said.

So we turn to that beacon of sex education to enlighten us--Hiba Kotb. Remember her? She's the Muslim sex therapist who weds science and religion and says scientific things like homosexuality is a "disease." According to her, hymen reconstruction is a bad idea because the woman is not really a virgin and she and her husband are just pretending and deceiving themselves. Duh!! "How could they have fun when they are really pretending that she is a virgin and he is deflowering (what a word!!!) her for the first time?", she asks. She also says that this practice is close to "tadlees," an Arabic word I don't know ( my Arabic dictionary is still packed in a box in my basement and I'm too tired to go get it).

Others are panicky that if this hymen reconstruction business takes off, how is a man to know that the woman he married is really a virgin?

I guess there isn't a way for him to know : )

For related storied I blogged earlier, see the ones about "vagina jobs" in the US and in the Arab world.

Little Mosque in the Prairie: Second Episode

This is the second episode of the Canadian sitcom "Little Mosque in the Prairie."

The men want to erect a barrier in the mosque to separate them from the women. Some women don't like it. At least one thinks it's a good idea. The episode does a good job of showing the way the right wing Islmophobes use women's issues to bash Islam.

The dialogue is a bit too self conscious and stilted, but with some good lines. The hijab (will she wear it or won't she?) is promised for future episodes.

Will this sit-com do to Muslim Americans what The Bill Cosby Show did to African Americans?

Hurt Only Arabs

Danny Rubinstein argues that there is already a state in the West Bank, separate from the State of Israel. He calls it "The State of Judea."

According to him, "Three bodies control the state beyond the Green Line: the Shin Bet security service and the Israeli military establishment; a limping Palestinian Authority; and the Jewish settlers' councils."

He concludes, "
In the State of Judea, it is permissible to hurt only Arabs. Do not disturb the Jews."

Monday, January 22, 2007

Rape and Torture in Egypt

How do you break a man?

You sodomize him, film the rape, then beam it to his family and friends to humiliate him. You also throw him in jail.

Welcome to Egypt! Umm el Dunya. Mother of the World!

Welcome to the world of broken Arab men and women.

Enjoy your stay. And for entertainment, you can watch the video below. Not of the man. That I don't have the heart to show. But this should do. It stars a real Arab woman. A real, real, real Arab woman. The poets among you should write a poem about her. The beauty of her eyes, the radiant smile, how she reminds you of the homeland and your mother's bread.

(warning: video is as graphic and disturbing as torture usually is).

Good night world. You suck!

A Cursing Song?

This is the only song I know of by an Arab woman with the word "damn" in it. I like it. It has bite.


powered by ODEO

The Handshake That Didn't Happen

What makes us who we are? I'm not talking about the big lables that parents, people, states, and enemies pin on us. I'm not talking about the upheavals and cruelties of history that shape us. I'm not talking wars or revolutions. I'm not talking Chanel or hijab. I'm talking about those hardly noticeable moments that are dramatic only to us and that change our lives one moment at a time.

I was reminded of such a life-changing moment this morning. I was 14. Your typical painfully self-conscious, self-centered, angular, awkward girl. A "good girl" to boot: the "from home to school" type, with the occasional visit to a friend's house. One day on such a visit, I ran into my friend's parents sitting with other relatives. Doing what I'm expected to do, I approached them to shake hands, as it is the habit. When I extended my hand to the father, my hand just hung there. All alone. Not met. Spurned. Rejected. Embarrassed. Humiliated. The man muttered a quick greeting that I didn't hear. I went deaf. I became all Hand. Hands don't have ears or mouths or eyes. But, god, do they feel!!

The whole encounter took seconds but lasted a life time. That was the first time I learned that some Muslim men won't shake my hand. Even at 14 I have shaken many a man's hand--cousins, uncles, family friends, neighbors, strangers--but this was my first encounter with a Muslim man who refused to shake hands.

I didn't like it. I didn't like it one bit. I wasn't interested in knowing the theological justification for it; I didn't do research to see which Muslim school allowed a man to shake hands with a woman and which didn't. I didn't give a damn. I only cared about how it made me feel--about my body and my female being. It wasn't a good feeling. I wanted to disappear and wished the ground would open and swallow me. I shrank, physically and psychologically. I wished I had no hands, no breasts, no lips, no eyes, no thighs, no vagina. I wished I were nothing.

And I smarted for weeks. Exactly the way I smarted years later when a jerk grabbed my breast in a crowded street in the Old City of Jerusalem.

I wouldn't say a feminist was born that day, but certainly an angry girl was. A necessary step. After all, an avalanche starts with one snow flake (yes, we have snow today)

I was reminded of this moment by the news story about the Muslim British police officer who refused to shake her boss's hand during a public ceremony. She's being defended by British Islamic leaders on the grounds that what she's doing is "in line with common Islamic practice." They are calling for "greater understanding of cultural differences." I thought it was interesting that Sheikh Ibrahim Mogra, of the Muslim Council of Britain, said Islamic law was "not set in concrete." He elaborated: "If the officer is called to a male victim who has been shot, the laws go out of the window. If she has to resuscitate that dying person, Muslim law will then change and allow her all sorts of physical contact because a life is at risk and life is so precious."

Oh, it's so rational of him to allow her--a police officer--to save a dying man. I just wish this rationality would extend all the way, and this law would just go out of the window for good.

Anyway, in my opinion, as long as this woman's religious practices don't infringe on other poeple's rights (including the right to be saved or arrested or beaten up by a police officer), she can do what she wants.

But I don't have to like it. Because I don't.

I never stopped extending my hand to men. But now if a man spurns it, I let him know what I think.

Wa qad A3thara man anthar. You're warned!

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Good Muslim Girl: New Magazine for American Muslim Teens


Muslim Girl is a magazine launched this month in the United States. It's marketed to young Muslim American girls aged 14-18 after a nation-wide study revealed the terribly, terribly shocking news that "American teen Muslim girls are much like teen girls everywhere." For that they get to have a life style magazine all their own. (Arabic)

So what do Muslim American (or is it American Muslim?) girls do?

Apparently, they "... go to public schools, watch a little too much television, read teen magazines, surf the Internet, use Google, enjoy YouTube, play video games, shop a lot, talk on the telephone and spend time just hanging out." (oh, come on. I'm sure they do a few other things too!)

But let's not ignore the differences: "for example, they get news at Al Jazeera, socialize at IslamiCity and count among their top hobbies, Qur’an study."

These scary difference, however, can be tolerated in light of the happy fact that Muslim teens come from relatively well-to-do households with money to spend. Drool and launch.

Ausma Khan, the editor-in-chief, explains how the magazine seeks to dispel stereotypes of American Muslim youth:

“We’re showing hijab-wearing basketball players alongside contemporary fashion designers and artists. We want to dispel the notion that Muslim teens conform to one particular model. Veiled or unveiled, Muslim girls participate fearlessly in sports, the arts, international travel and their local mosques.” (read more)

This is a worthy goal and shouldn't be hard to achieve. What is more challenging and interesting, however, is the ideal of Muslim girlhood that the magazine will market to its young readers. I'm no fan of life style teen or women's magazines, so I'm skeptical of this one too. I'm skeptical for other reasons as well but will keep my mouth shut for now.

For its first cover the magazine chose the face of a hijabi girl with red, white, blue star stickers on her face (I would have gone with a montage of girls to highlight the diversity, but, hey, I'm weird). She's not wrapping herself with the American flag yet, but comes pretty close. Perhaps next time. Unless they decide to go with a provocatively coy star and striped burqini clad Muslim Mademoiselle.

Anyone interested in starting Bad Arab Girl Magazine with me? I know it will sell. Or is it too...

Ok. You fill in the blank; I have to go make dinner.

A Song To End a Bad Day

...And because I love you, I'll give it one more try...


powered by ODEO

Saturday, January 20, 2007

An Iraqi Woman for 4 Dollars? Ya Balash!!

This is prostitution. No. prostitution is better. Because it is more honest. So called temporary or "enjoyment marriage" allows men to exploit women sexually and to feel righteous about it because it's religiously sanctioned. @#$%

And who should I thank for unleashing all those sleazy "but-I-have-needs- clerks" on Iraq? Oh, don't tell me.

I'm fuming! I'm going to hit somebody today!!

Another Day, Another Murder

Why can't I find stories like this one in the Palestinian or Arab press? Why do I have to wait for Haartez (mainly Gideon Levy and Amira Hass) to read humanizing stories of Palestinian victims murdered by Israeli occupation? What is our press busy with exactly? What is more important? The latest hiccup of the king? The latest diarrhetic statement from Dahlan or Abu Bateekh el Sham? The latest sighting of Saddam's face in the moon?

Friday, January 19, 2007

The Koufeyyeh is Back!!


Fashion-conscious radicals can rejoice. The Palestinian Koufeyyeh (not the watered down Kafeyeh, or Keffiyeh, or Kefaya) is back! It has miraculously regained its radical chicness just at the very moment we all thought it was lost to corporate appropriation. Our hearts sank and we held our breath and each other's hand, fearing that Palestine was a lost cause when Urban Outfitters started selling OUR koufeyyeh, in multiple colors, as a chic anti-war accessory for $ 20.

It almost killed us that it was a best-selling item!

But, now we can all take a deep breath. The accessorising of the Palestinian cause is over! And for that we have to thank some anti-Palestinian groups who vehemently protested the sale of the item and successfully forced Urban Outfitters to apologize and discontinue it.

So let's celebrate this GREAT victory (although not of our making but since when does this deter us)! The koufeyyeh, thanks to our enemies, is radical chic again!

(A nerdy aside: the best thing written about the history of the Koufeyyeh is the chapter in Ted Swedengburg's excellent book Memories of Revolt:1936-1939 Rebellion and the Palestinian National Past).

"Neighbors" From Hell


Thanks to the video shot by a Palestinian woman, Raja abu Aisha, of the Hebron settler woman cursing at her, the Israeli press (at least Haaretz) discovered the city of Hebron and is telling its tale. Although the writer of this article tells the Hebron story also from the settlers' point of view ("oh, it's just an ordinary fight between women, one of whom wasn't too refined"), the overall picture that is captured reflects the surreal nature of Palestinian life in Hebron. The parts about how Palestinian children's lives are impacted by this madness are particularly maddening.

A classic Kafkaeaque moment is when Palestinians complain to the police of settler violence. Raja's grandfather explains the "process":

"every time we complain, the police demand that we say exactly who attacked us, what his name is, what he looks like, what the color of his eyes is, what shape of skullcap he has and what his father's name is. If we can't answer all of those questions, they don't deal with the complaint."

I'm sure when a settler complains of a Palestinian, no such questioning is needed. Any Palestinian will do. Arabs, like all "Others", all look the same, which greatly facilitates the law enforcement business.

Make no mistake about it: what is going on in Hebron--the forced appropriation of land, the daily harassment, the humiliation, the restrictions on movement, the destruction of commercial life--is organized sate violence and standard Israeli colonial policy.


Thursday, January 18, 2007

Report: Israel Still Controls Gaza

A new report by Gisha, the Legal Center for Freedom of Movement, a Tel Aviv-based rights group, debunks Israel's recently manufactured big lie that it has left Gaza. It shows that although the army and the settlements have been removed, Israel still controls Gaza. According to In Disengaged Occupiers: the Legal Status of Gaza:

"Israel controls Gaza through a kind of 'invisible hand', which is hard to see but felt intensely by Gaza residents, who know that their ability to do basic things – buy milk, turn on electric lights, travel abroad – depend on decisions made by Israel."

I should add that this report debunks the smaller lie of the Palestinian groups who bragged that they "liberated" Gaza. It goes both ways!


Arab Women Singers Rock!


Ghada Shbair, a Lebanese singer, is being nominated for the BBC World Music Awards for her CD Mouwashahat, which consists of a mix of Andalusian songs, old and new. Here's a sample.

Algerian singer Souad Massi won the award in 2006.

Haifa Wahbi was disappointed she wasn't nominated. She's been heard saying that she feels lots of "wawa" for the BBC slight.

For another sample of Andalousiyyat, here's one of Fairuz's all time classics:


powered by ODEO



You've Come A Long Way, Baby!


One great advantage to having a woman as speaker of the house is that the American media now can run more silly stories irrelevant to your life and mine, like this one by The New York Times about, you guessed it, fashion.

The article does tell us that "During her first week on the job, Mrs. Pelosi clinched votes in the House on the minimum wage, financing for stem cell research and Medicare drug prices, drawing two veto threats (for research and drugs) from a notoriously veto-averse president."

But that's fluff. The article swiftly becomes hard core:

"And she did it looking preternaturally fresh, with a wardrobe that, while still subdued and overreliant on suits, has seldom spruced the halls of Congress. On Jan. 9, a Tuesday, she wore an impeccable black and white tweed skirt suit, with strong shoulders and the jacket nipped at the waist; on Wednesday, she draped a red shawl insouciantly around a red suit outside the White House; and on Thursday, she appeared in a mod, deep-blue velvet, slimming pantsuit."

Pelosi said that her husband buys her clothes. So the media now wants to know if the speaker of the house wears Victoria's Secrets underwear. A push up power bra has been detected, but since such reports of weapons of mass destruction have been grossly exaggerated before, they are reluctant to draw hasty conclusions. However, they are investigating and, be assured, will keep us (mis) informed as more irrelevant but crucial sartorial details emerge.

In the meantime, America is feeling Ms. Pelosi's power: " orders of Tahitian pearls have skyrocketed."

Latifa + Ziad Rahbani = Benous el Jaww




powered by ODEO

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Cars, Laws, and Donkeys

How do they come up with these "laws"? Just when you think they can't possibly think of anymore hellish rules to control the movement of the Palestinians, they come up with one!! A new Israeli law prohibits Israelis and foreigners from taking Palestinians as passengers in their cars throughout the West Bank. To give the new law a particular Kafkaesque flavor, it is the Palestinian who will be criminalized if the law is broken. (details here from Amira Hass)

The prohibition seems to be limited to cars. Donkeys are not mentioned. So I predict that we will be seeing more Palestinians and their Israeli and foreign friends riding donkeys on their trips together back and forth to protest the illegal wall. That is until the next apartheid "law."

But for now, take my word: donkeys are back. Start practicing.

Art: Athir Shayota (DC Event)



Athir Shayota is an Iraqi artist living in New York. His work is currently on exhibit at the Jerusalem Fund Gallery in Washington DC through March 2nd. Here you can read an interview with the artist.

From The Jerusalem Fund blurb:

"A painting of a man sitting with raw meat hanging behind him Shayota's portaits of Iraqis living in America are painted without narrative intention. Instead, psychological spaces, placement of figures, and paint application tell the story. The collection begins in the early eighties when Shayota started painting the daily life of the Detroit Chaldean community to which he immigrated in 1980. With the first and second Gulf War, Shayota's work takes on a different mood. Although portrayed with compassion, those depicted reflect the intensifying violent world in which they live. While Shayota creates referential paintings that utilize Western Modernist modes of aesthetic representation, like other contemporary Iraqi artists, his work contains direct references to the historical heritage of Iraq. With the continuation of the artistic heritage of his people, Shayota preserves, reiterates and intensifies the long and rich history of Iraqi visual culture and projects an unwavering sense of resilience."


Tuesday, January 16, 2007

"The Watch List": Arab/Iranian American Comedy

"The Watch List" is a new comedy show the Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) is quite excited about. This is from their statement:

"ADC welcomes the new show, "The Watch List," co-produced for Comedy Central by Arab-American comedian Dean Obeidallah and Emmy award wining comedy writer Max Brooks.

This groundbreaking comedy show is the first to be produced by a major American entertainment company and stars all Middle Eastern-American performers (Arab and Iranian-American.) It’s a combination of stand up and sketch comedy and a chance to show a positive, funny side to the community in mainstream American entertainment media. Featured on the show are top comics Maz Jobrani, Ahmed Ahmed, Dean Obeidallah, Seena Jon, Maysoon Zayid, Ronnie Khalil and many more.

The first 3 episodes were released January 15, and a new episode will be released each week thereafter for 3 weeks. The more people who download the show (it's free to download) the better chance of getting "The Watch List," or another show one starring Arab-Americans on Comedy Central TV in the future. "The Watch List" is now airing on Comedy Central.com or: www.comedycentral.com/shows/watch_list/index.jhtml"

Check it out.

Poem: "Speech of the Red Indian"


During her recent visit to Ramallah, Rice was greeted by some protesting Palestinians dressed as native Americans and carrying signs reading,"Mrs. Rice, The Indian wars are not over. We are still here too." I don't know whose brilliant idea this was, but it didn't look good. In fact, it looked quite bad. The costumes and "Indian face" are offensive. And what is their point anyway: that we, the Native Americans of this land, are still here and have not been annihilated like the other ones? I'd rather believe that they were trying to draw parallels between the Palestinian struggle and that of the Native Americans.


The best expression of the parallels and connections between Palestinians and Native Americans is Mahmoud Darwish's poem "Speech of the Red Indian." They should have dispensed with the costumes and just gave Rice a copy of the poem. (it's long but worth it)


Speech of the Red Indian

Mahmoud Darwish


1


So, we are who we are, as the Mississippi flows,

and what remains from yesterday is still ours--

but the color of the sky has changed,

the sea to the East has changed.

O white master, Lord of the horses,

what do you want from those making their way

to the night woods?

Our pastures are sacred, our spirits inspired,

the stars are luminous words where our fable

is legible from the beginning to end

if only you'll lift up your eyes:

born between water and fire,

reborn in clouds on an azure shore

after Judgement day...


Don't kill the grass any more,

it possess a soul in us that could

shelter the soul of the earth.


Tamer of horses, teach your horse

to ask forgiveness of nature's soul

for the way you've treated our trees:

O Sister tree,

look how they've tortured you

the way they've tortured me;

never ask forgiveness

for the woodcutter whose axe felled

both your mother and mine...


2


The white man will never understand the ancient words

here in spirits roaming free

between sky and trees.


Let Columbus scour the seas to find India,

it's his right!

He can call our ghosts the names of spices,

he can call us Red Indians,

he can fiddle with his compass to correct his course,

twist all the errors of the North wind,

but outside the narrow world to his map

he can't believe that all men are born equal

the same as air and water,

the same as people in Barcelona,

except that they happen to worship Nature's God in everthing

and not gold.

Columbus was free to look for a language

he couldn't find here,

to look for gold in the skulls of our ancestors.

He took his fill from the flesh of our living

and our dead.

So why is he bent on carrying out his deadly war

even from the grave?

When we have nothing left to give

but a few ruinous trinkets, a few tiny feathers to

embroider our lakes?



All told,

you killed over seventy million hearts,

more than enough for you to return from slaughter

as kind on the throne of a new age.



Isn't it about time, stranger,

for us to meet face to face in the same age,

both of us strangers to the same land,

meeting at the tip of an abyss?


We have what is ours and

we have what is yours of the sky.

Yours air and water, such as we have.

Ours pebbles, such as we have,

yours iron, such as you have.


In the shadow domain, let us share the light.

Take what you need of the night

but leave us a few stars to bury our celestial dead.

Take what you need of the sea

but leave us a few waves in which to catch our fish.

Take all the gold of the earth and sun

but leave the land of our names to us.


Then go back, stranger.

Search for India once more!



3


Our names: branching leaves of divine speech,

birds that soar higher than a gun.


You who come from beyond the sea, bent on war,

don't cut down the tree of our names,

don't gallop your flaming horses across

the open plains.

You have your god and we have ours,

you have your religion and we have ours.

Don't buy your God

in books that back up your claim of

your land over our land,

don't appoint your God to be a mere

courtier in the palace of the King.


Take the rose of our dreams

and see what we've seen of joy.

Sleep in the shade of our willows

and start to fly like a dove--

this, after all, is what our ancestors did

when they flew away in peace

and returned in peace.



You won't remember leaving the Mediterranean,

eternity's solitude in the middle of a forest

rather than on the edge of a cliff.

What you lack is the wisdom of defeat,

a lost war, a rock standing firm

in the rushof time's furious river,

an hour of reverie for a necessary sky of dust to

ripen inside,

an hour of hesitation between one path and another.


One day Euripides will be missing

as well as the hymns of Canaan and Babylon,

Solomon's Song of Songs for Shulamith

and the yearning lily of the valley.

What you white men need will be the memory of

how to tame the horses of madness,

hearts polished by pumice in a flurry of violins.

All this you will need,

as well as a hesitant gun.


(But if you must kill, white man, don't slay

the creatures that befriended us.

Don't slaughter our past.)


You will need a treaty with our ghosts on those

sterile winter nights,

a less bright sun, a less full moon

for the crime to appear

less glamorous on the screen.


So take your time

as you dismember God.



4


We know what this elegant enigma conceals from us:

a heaven dies.

A willow strays, wind-footed,

a beast establishes its kingdom

in hollows of wounded space,

ocean-waters drench the wood of our doors with salt,

earth's a primordial burden heavier than before

but similar to something we've known since the

beginning of time.


Winds will recite our beginning and our end

though our present bleeds

and our days are buried in the ashes of legend.


We know that Athens is not ours

and can identify the color of the days

from puff clouds or rising smoke.

But Athens isn't yours as well,

yet we know what mighty iron is preparing for us

for the gods that failed

to defend the salt in our bread.

We know that truth is stronger than righteousness,

and that times changed

when the technology of weapons changed.


Who will raise our voices to the rainless clouds?

Who will rinse the light after we're gone?

Who will tend our temples,

who will safeguard our traditions

from the clash of steel?


We bring you civilization,” said the stranger.

We're the masters of time

come to inherit this land of yours.

March in Indian file so we can tally you

on the face of the lake, corpse by corpse.

Keep marching, so the Gospels may thrive!

We want God all to ourselves

because the best Indians are dead Indians

in the eyes of the Lord.”


The Lord is white and the day is white.

You have your world and we have ours.

What the stranger says is truly strange.

He digs a well deep in the earth to bury the sky.

Truly strange, what the stranger says!

He hunts down our children, as well as butterflies.

O stranger, what promises do you make to our garden,

zinc flowers prettier than ours?

Fine.

But do you know that a deer

will never approach grass that's been

stained with our blood?


Buffalos are our brothers and sisters, as well as

everything that grows.

Don't dig any deeper!

Don't pierce the shell of the turtle that carries our grandmother

the earth on its back!

Our trees are her hair,

and we adorn ourselves with her blooms.


“There's no death on earth,”

so don't break her delicate formation!

Don't bruise the earth, don't smash

the smooth mirror of her orchards,

don't startle her, don't murder the river-waisted one

whose grandchildren we are.


We'll be gone soon enough.


Take our blood,

but leave the earth alone:

God's most elaborate

writing on the face of the waters,

for His sake and ours.


We still hear our ancestors' voices on the wind,

we listen to their pulse in the flowering trees.

This earth is our grandmother, each stone sacred,

and the hut where gods dwelt with us

and stars lit up our nights of prayer.

We roamed naked and walked barefoot to touch

the souls of the stones

so that the spirit or air would unfold us in women

who would replenish nature's gifts.


Our history was her history.


To endure our life

go away and come back.


Return the spirits,

one by one,

to the earth.


We keep the memory of our loved ones in jars,

like oil and salt, whose names we tied

to wings of water birds.


We were here first,

no ceiling to separate our blue doors from the sky,

no horses to graze where our deer used to graze,

no strangers bursting in on the night of our wives.


O give the wind a flute to weep for the people

of this wounded place,

and tomorrow to weep for you.


And tomorrow to weep for you.



5


Tending our last fires

we fail to acknowledge your greetings.


Don't write commandments

from your new steel god for us.


Don't demand peace treaties from the dead.

There's no one left to greet you in peace,

which is nowhere to be seen.


We lived and flourished before the onslaught of

English guns, French wine and influenza,

living in harmony side by side with the Deer People,

learning our oral history by heart.

We brought you tidings of innocence and daisies.

But you have your god and we have ours.

You have your past and we have ours.

Time is a river

blurred by the tears we gaze through.

But don't you ever

memorize a few lines of poetry, perhaps,

to restrain yourself from massacre?


Weren't you born of a woman?

Didn't you suckle the milk of longing

from your mother as we did?


Didn't you attach paper wings to your shoulders

to chase swallows as we did?


We brought you tidings of the Spring.

(Don't point your guns at us!)


We can exchange gifts, we can sing:

My people were here once, then they died here...

Chestnut trees hide their souls here.

My people will return in the air,

in water

in light...


Take my motherland by the sword!


I refuse to sign a treaty between victim and killer.


I refuse to sign a bill of sale

that takes possession

of so much as one inch of my weed patch,

of so much as one inch of my cornfield

even if it's my last salutation to the sun!


As I wade into the river wrapped in my name only

I know I'm returning to my mother's bosom

so that you, white master, can enter your Age.


Enter your brutal statues of liberty over my corpse.

Engrave your iron crosses on my stony shadow,

for soon I will rise to the height of the song

sung by those multitudes suicided by their

dispersion through history

at a mass where our voices will soar like birds:


Here strangers won

over salt and sea mixed with clouds.

Here strangers won

over corn husks within us

as they laid down their cables for

lightning and electicity.


Here's where the grieving eagle

dived to his death.

Here's where strangers won over us

leaving us nothing for the New Age.


Here our bodies evaporate, cloud by cloud, into space.

Here our spirits glow, star by star, in the sky of song.



6


A long time will have to go by before our

present becomes our past, just like us.


We will face our death, but first

we'll defend the trees we wear.


We'll venerate the bell of night, the moon

hanging over our shacks.


We'll defend our leaping deer,

the clay of our jars, the feathers

in the wings of our last songs.


Soon you'll raise your world over ours,

blazing a trail from our graveyards to a satellite.


This is the Iron Age: distilled from a lump of coal,

champagne bubbling for the mighty!


There are dead and there are colonies.

There are dead and there are bulldozers.

There are dead and there are hospitals.

There are dead and there are radar screens

to observe the dead

as they die more than once in this life,

screens to observe the dead who live on after death

as well as those who die

to lift the earth above all that has died.


O white master, where are you taking my people

and yours?


Into what abyss

is this robot bristling with aircraft carriers and jets

consigning the earth?


To what fathomless pit

will you decend?


It's your to decide.


A new Rome, a technological Sparta and an

ideology for the insane...

but we'd rather depart from an Age

our minds can't accept.


Once a people,

now we'd rather flock to the land of birds.

We'll take a peek at our homeland through stones,

glimpse it through openings in clouds,

through the speech of stars,

through the air suspended above lakes,

between soft tassel fringes in ears of corn.


We'll emerge from the flower of the grave.

We'll lean out of the poplar's leaves

of all that besieges you, O white man,

of all the dead who are still dying,

both those who live and those

who return to tell the tale.


Let's give the earth enough time to tell

the whole truth about your and us.


The whole truth about us.

The whole truth about you.



7


In rooms you build,

the dead are already asleep.


Over bridges you construct,

the dead are already passing.


There are dead who light up the night

of butterflies,

and the dead who come at dawn

to drink your tea

as peaceful as on the day your

guns mowed them down.


O you who are guests in this place,

leave a few chairs empty


for your hosts to read out

the conditions for peace

in a treaty with the dead.

October 1992 (From: Eleven Planets. Translated by Sargon Boulos for Mahmour Darwish: The Adam of Two Edens. Syracuse UP, 2000. 129-145)