Unbelievable! This is really sick. So now the world started combining the words Jihad and Gay together. It is not enough they are GAYS, they want us to be sympathetic with them and believe its natural thing, poor imam. Truly, Worst days for Islam nowadays.
some fight to be free from bloody occupations, assassinations, starvation, torture, apartheid, and dictatorship, some fight for their right to announce their favorite sexual positions public.
First, it's not the "world" who is combining the word jihad and Muslim; it's Muslims themselves who are doing that. So there's no conspiracy here.
Second, I don't agree that there is anything "sick" about being gay. I would argue that homophobia and gay bashing is what is sick. Very very sick.
Third, I wish you are bothered more by those who are really hurting Islam and Muslims such as those committing crimes in the name of their Islam. Gay Muslims are not hurting anyone. In fact, they are a testimony that Islam is a live religion not a a fossilized one as some people would like us believe.
Fourth, in case you didn't notice, this is a gay friendly sight. You may disagree with me about this issue as long as you express your disagreement in reasonably decent way. Gay bashing, on the other hand, will not be tolerated.
You are trivializing the struggle for gay rights. It is not a separate struggle from all the ones you list and seem to approve of. What is the point of fighting against occupation and apartheid and torture if you are going to end up living in a homophobic society that would punish you for sexual expression.
It is the same fight: for freedom from all forms of oppression,and for justice and human dignity.
Amal, do you support a person's freedom to have sex with a cow? a brother with a consenting sister, so long as no children will be born? a mother and her adult son, so long as no children will be born? multiple partners? are there causes you are willing to champion? or you are you only willing to champion one type of sexual position? if so, that's pretty selective and hypocritical.
I see. You are dodging the questions. The questions are clear. please answer them.
do you support a person's freedom to have sex with a cow? a brother with a consenting sister, so long as no children will be born? a mother and her adult son, so long as no children will be born? multiple partners? are there causes you are willing to champion?
No, i did not notice its gay friendly sight until now.
Why do we prevent a 3 years old child from going down to street and playing between the cars, it is his choice. But, ofcourse we know things he does not know. Regarding homosexuality, the one who knows more than all of us, prevented us from going there.
You appear to be abnormally obsessed with bestiality and incest, and so it makes sense that you should wish to remain anonymous while you are still struggling with this fixation. But really your psychiatrist is the one you should be talking to about these problems. A caring professional can help you.
as expected. no answers. nothing. just an irrational argument that tries to pass a mental disorder as a normal behavior. why? because the west says so.
this is so hilarious. you just can't answer these questions. it's really a checkmate for you. you know that the moment you answer these questions you would either denounce yourself or embrace total collapse of morality as we know it.
I worry that you might make a public fool of yourself with this hypocritical line of argument (sic).
You, after all, are the one who dodged my original question by responding with your own bizarre questions. Anyone reading can see this.
You seem very desperate to talk about bestiality and incest, however. Your demands and dares indicate a dangerous psychological instability.
Again, there are professionals who can help you with this obsession. You will feel much better if you can find a way to stop thinking about sex with cows all the time.
kb, it seems you are the one obsessed with defending homosexual behavior. i can see anons' point of view. if you defend queer sexual behavior based on free choice argument, you must extend that to other forms of sexual disorders and queer behavior. but if you denounce bestiality and incense, you will have to do so based on either religious argument or something equally irrational.
If you'll read the conversation, you will see that I haven't written a word in defense of anything at all, other than the honor of unmarried cows.
That said, I do in fact stand in strong support of incense, which is hardly a western imposition. We must defend sweet-smelling smoke against the repressive forces of...well, I guess ultimately of the Protestant reformation. Thank you for drawing attention to this overlooked struggle.
I know a checkmate when I see one. That's the mother of all checkmates. I have always wondered how homosexuals and their supporters can defend their sexual preferences but still close the door on other sexual preferences. I mean where do we draw the line as a society? today it's men screwing men, then women screwing women. next, it's men screwing their dogs, brothers sleeping with their sisters, sons with their mothers. where does it all end? it will never end.
when a dog(cow ...etc) develops a brain capable of holding a conversation. a brother and sister can get married with the consent of their parents
as for the rest ya, you can go ahead and screw as many cows, brothers, sisters, mothers, and multiple partners as you want if you are doing it for fun.
What you can't do is inherent, have legal custody, be able to have legal standing position in cases of emergency
you know all the things that don't involve the disturbing thoughts that keep rolling in ur head.
so are your questions answered or you would prefer another go at it ? or maybe you are a bit slow and you need me to double post the answers separately
18 comments:
Unbelievable! This is really sick. So now the world started combining the words Jihad and Gay together.
It is not enough they are GAYS, they want us to be sympathetic with them and believe its natural thing, poor imam.
Truly, Worst days for Islam nowadays.
some fight to be free from bloody occupations, assassinations, starvation, torture, apartheid, and dictatorship, some fight for their right to announce their favorite sexual positions public.
bilal,
First, it's not the "world" who is combining the word jihad and Muslim; it's Muslims themselves who are doing that. So there's no conspiracy here.
Second, I don't agree that there is anything "sick" about being gay. I would argue that homophobia and gay bashing is what is sick. Very very sick.
Third, I wish you are bothered more by those who are really hurting Islam and Muslims such as those committing crimes in the name of their Islam. Gay Muslims are not hurting anyone. In fact, they are a testimony that Islam is a live religion not a a fossilized one as some people would like us believe.
Fourth, in case you didn't notice, this is a gay friendly sight. You may disagree with me about this issue as long as you express your disagreement in reasonably decent way. Gay bashing, on the other hand, will not be tolerated.
Anonymous,
You are trivializing the struggle for gay rights. It is not a separate struggle from all the ones you list and seem to approve of. What is the point of fighting against occupation and apartheid and torture if you are going to end up living in a homophobic society that would punish you for sexual expression.
It is the same fight: for freedom from all forms of oppression,and for justice and human dignity.
Amal, do you support a person's freedom to have sex with a cow? a brother with a consenting sister, so long as no children will be born? a mother and her adult son, so long as no children will be born? multiple partners? are there causes you are willing to champion? or you are you only willing to champion one type of sexual position? if so, that's pretty selective and hypocritical.
Anonymous #2:
Please, could you tell us what "sexual position" you recommend?
Very sincerely,
kb
I see. You are dodging the questions. The questions are clear. please answer them.
do you support a person's freedom to have sex with a cow? a brother with a consenting sister, so long as no children will be born? a mother and her adult son, so long as no children will be born? multiple partners? are there causes you are willing to champion?
No, i did not notice its gay friendly sight until now.
Why do we prevent a 3 years old child from going down to street and playing between the cars, it is his choice. But, ofcourse we know things he does not know.
Regarding homosexuality, the one who knows more than all of us, prevented us from going there.
this is a typical debate that starts with simple clear questions and ends with convultoted doublspeak.
Let me repeat each question and please put the answer below it:
- do you support an adult male's right to have sex with a cow?
- do you support the right of two consenting adult brother and sister to have sex, provided the will be no birth?
- do you support the right of a mother and an adult son, both consenting, to have sex, provided the will be no birth?
- do you support the right of 3 or more adults to have a sexual relatioship?
PLEASE, WOULD YOU BE KIND ENOUGH TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS EITHER YES OR NO.
Dear Anonymous,
You appear to be abnormally obsessed with bestiality and incest, and so it makes sense that you should wish to remain anonymous while you are still struggling with this fixation. But really your psychiatrist is the one you should be talking to about these problems. A caring professional can help you.
With best wishes for a healthy recovery,
kb
as expected. no answers. nothing. just an irrational argument that tries to pass a mental disorder as a normal behavior. why? because the west says so.
I DARE YOU TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!!!
Dear Anonymous,
You seem to have lost all composure. Get help fast. For the sake of the cows.
Concerned for your visibly deteriorating mental health,
kb
this is so hilarious. you just can't answer these questions. it's really a checkmate for you. you know that the moment you answer these questions you would either denounce yourself or embrace total collapse of morality as we know it.
Dear Anonymous,
I worry that you might make a public fool of yourself with this hypocritical line of argument (sic).
You, after all, are the one who dodged my original question by responding with your own bizarre questions. Anyone reading can see this.
You seem very desperate to talk about bestiality and incest, however. Your demands and dares indicate a dangerous psychological instability.
Again, there are professionals who can help you with this obsession. You will feel much better if you can find a way to stop thinking about sex with cows all the time.
Best of luck to you in your struggle,
kb
kb, it seems you are the one obsessed with defending homosexual behavior. i can see anons' point of view. if you defend queer sexual behavior based on free choice argument, you must extend that to other forms of sexual disorders and queer behavior. but if you denounce bestiality and incense, you will have to do so based on either religious argument or something equally irrational.
Dear Sharma,
If you'll read the conversation, you will see that I haven't written a word in defense of anything at all, other than the honor of unmarried cows.
That said, I do in fact stand in strong support of incense, which is hardly a western imposition. We must defend sweet-smelling smoke against the repressive forces of...well, I guess ultimately of the Protestant reformation. Thank you for drawing attention to this overlooked struggle.
Sincerely,
kb
I know a checkmate when I see one. That's the mother of all checkmates. I have always wondered how homosexuals and their supporters can defend their sexual preferences but still close the door on other sexual preferences. I mean where do we draw the line as a society? today it's men screwing men, then women screwing women. next, it's men screwing their dogs, brothers sleeping with their sisters, sons with their mothers. where does it all end? it will never end.
when a dog(cow ...etc) develops a brain capable of holding a conversation.
a brother and sister can get married with the consent of their parents
as for the rest ya, you can go ahead and screw as many cows, brothers, sisters, mothers, and multiple partners as you want if you are doing it for fun.
What you can't do is inherent, have legal custody, be able to have legal standing position in cases of emergency
you know all the things that don't involve the disturbing thoughts that keep rolling in ur head.
so are your questions answered or you would prefer another go at it ?
or maybe you are a bit slow and you need me to double post the answers separately
Post a Comment